Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 190
Filter
1.
European Journal of Human Genetics ; 31(Supplement 1):343-344, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20239389

ABSTRACT

Background/Objectives: One of the most remarkable features of SARS-CoV-2 infection is that a large proportion of individuals are asymptomatic while others experience progressive, even lifethreatening acute respiratory distress syndrome, and some suffer from prolonged symptoms (long COVID). The contribution of host genetics to susceptibility and severity of infectious disease is well-documented, and include rare monogenic inborn errors of immunity as well as common genetic variation. Studies on genetic risk factors for long COVID have not yet been published. Method(s): We compared long COVID (1534) to COVID-19 patients (96,692) and population controls (800,353) using both questionnaire and EHR- based studies. First meta-analysis of 11 GWAS studies from 8 countries did not show genome-wide significant associations. Result(s): Testing 24 variants earlier associated to COVID-19 susceptibility or severity by COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative showed genetic variation in rs505922, an intronic variant in ABO blood group gene, to be associated with long COVID compared to population controls (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.07-1.27, p = 0.033). (Within-COVID analysis gave similar OR, but was not significant after conservative Bonferroni correction (OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06-1.30, p = 092)). Conclusion(s): The first data freeze of the Long COVID Host Genetics Initiative suggests that the O blood group is associated with a 14% reduced risk for long COVID. The following data freezes with growing sample sizes will possibly elucidate long COVID pathophysiology and pave the way for possible treatments for long lasting COVID symptoms.

2.
Latin American Journal of Pharmacy ; 42(Special Issue):119-123, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20231990

ABSTRACT

COV-19 has been quickly spreading in the world, producing lung inflammation and abrupt, even deadly, pulmonary collapse, COV-19were much higher in diabetic patients than in non-diabetic pa-tients. Diabetes is one of the primary causes of illness and death, and its prevalence is projected to increase rapidly over the next several decades. This investigation sought to determine how COVID-19 influenced the levels of glucose in the blood of patients diagnosed with type 1 and type 2 diabetes (DM), as well as whether or not the levels of glucose returned to normal following a recovery period of one month. Addi-tionally, there was a connection between ABO blood type and the severity of COV-19. The current study was to how COV-19 affected ABO group distribution and blood glucose levels in people who suffer from type 1 and 2 diabetes (DM). Study design: This study included ninety (90) patient divided into three groups: diabetes patient group (30) sample (control), 30 sample of DM with COV-19group and 30 sample recovery from Covid 19 after period one month of recovery, determination of the above mentioned blood groups was performed using manual method, and glucose levels measured of DM by diabetes device. The study demonstrated a relation between blood type ABO and COV-19, with type B blood being the most influenced by COV-19 in patients with type 2 diabetes, whereas there were no significant variations between blood types in those who suffer from type 1 diabetes. In type 1, 2 diabetic patients, no significant differences in blood glucose levels were found between diabetic patients with COV-19 and the recovery group from COV-19. The study displayed that the severity of COV-19 disease associated with B blood type in patients who suffer from type 2 diabetes and Cov-19 has no direct impact on blood glucose levels.Copyright © 2023, Colegio de Farmaceuticos de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. All rights reserved.

3.
Delineating Health and Health System: Mechanistic Insights into Covid 19 Complications ; : 419-429, 2021.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2323246

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a pandemic that is triggered by a novel coronavirus, named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2) or 2019-nCoV, causes primarily respiratory discomfort along with other mild symptoms/no symptoms, leading to severe illness and death, if proper care is not taken. At present, COVID-19 is the resilient reason for a large number of human casualties worldwide as well as a cause of crucial economic loss posturing global threat. There is a necessity of intensive research to elucidate the pathogenic mechanisms of COVID-19, which would assist in understating the susceptibility towards the infection as well as prompt development of effective prevention and treatment strategies. Over the years, clinical studies have indicated the risk of various pathogenic infections prejudiced due to preexisting chronic diseases as well as ABO blood group types to a larger extent. In line of this, current COVID-19 infection-associated clinical studies intensely endorse the relationship of blood group type of individual and risk of COVID-19 infection. In this chapter, various clinical studies from January 2020 to June 2020 have been summarized to highlight the eminence of ABO blood group and COVID-19 infection susceptibility in human population. These reports evidently support the fact that individuals with A histo blood group were found to be more vulnerable to COVID-19 infection whereas individuals with blood group O were less likely to get infected with virus. To get deeper insight in this fact, many more studies are desirable in order to further explicate the promising protective role of the blood group O and it will be supportive for designing and planning several additional countermeasures against COVID-19 infection. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021.

4.
Annals of Blood ; 6 (no pagination), 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2327184

ABSTRACT

The A and B oligosaccharide antigens of the ABO blood group system are produced from the common precursor, H substance, by enzymatic reactions catalyzed by A and B glycosyltransferases (AT and BT) encoded by functional A and B alleles at the ABO genetic locus, respectively. In 1990, my research team cloned human A, B, and O allelic cDNAs. We then demonstrated this central dogma of ABO and opened a new era of molecular genetics. We identified four amino acid substitutions between AT and BT and inactivating mutations in the O alleles, clarifying the allelic basis of ABO. We became the first to achieve successful ABO genotyping, discriminating between AA and AO genotypes and between BB and BO, which was impossible using immunohematological/serological methods. We also identified mutations in several subgroup alleles and also in the cis-AB and B(A) alleles that specify the expression of the A and B antigens by single alleles. Later, other scientists interested in the ABO system characterized many additional ABO alleles. However, the situation has changed drastically in the last decade, due to rapid advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, which has allowed the sequencing of several thousand genes and even the entire genome in individual experiments. Genome sequencing has revealed not only the exome but also transcription/translation regulatory elements. RNA sequencing determines which genes and spliced transcripts are expressed. Because more than 500,000 human genomes have been sequenced and deposited in sequence databases, bioinformaticians can retrieve and analyze this data without generating it. Now, in this era of genomics, we can harness the vast sequence information to unravel the molecular mechanisms responsible for important biological phenomena associated with the ABO polymorphism. Two examples are presented in this review: the delineation of the ABO gene evolution in a variety of species and the association of single nucleotide variant (SNV) sites in the ABO gene with diseases and biological parameters through genome-wide association studies (GWAS).Copyright © Annals of Blood. All rights reserved.

5.
Aims Medical Science ; 10(1):1-13, 2023.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2308236

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is still posing detrimental effects on people. An association between contracting COVID-19 and the ABO blood group type has been determined. However, factors that determine the severity of COVID-19 are not yet fully understood. Thus, the current study aimed to investigate whether the ABO blood group type has a role in the severity of complications due to COVID-19. Materials and methods: Eighty-Six ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients and 80 matched -healthy controls were recruited in the study from Baish general hospital, Saudi Arabia. ABO blood grouping, complete blood count (CBC), CBC-derived inflammatory markers, coagulation profile, D-Dimer and anti-T antigen were reported. Results: Our data showed that patients with blood groups O and B are more protective against severe complications from COVID-19, as compared to patients with blood groups A and AB. This could be partially attributed to the presence of anti-T in blood group A individuals, compared to non-blood group A. Conclusion: The current study reports an association between the ABO blood group and the susceptibility to severe complications from COVID-19, with a possible role of anti-T in driving the mechanism of the thrombotic tendency, as it was also correlated with an elevation in D-dimer levels.

6.
Annals of Blood ; 6(June) (no pagination), 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2290865

ABSTRACT

The use of convalescent plasma (CP) transfusions for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has gained great interest during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. This review aims at summarizing the literature on the potential mechanisms of action of COVID-19 CP (CCP) and the rationale for use. A narrative review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Database through October 2020. The rationale of CCP deployment was based on historical use in other outbreaks and pandemics and the emergent need at the time of lack of proven therapies and vaccines. There are many proposed mechanisms of action including direct neutralization and suppression of viremia, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, modification of the inflammatory response, restoration of the coagulation factors, immunomodulation of the hypercoagulable state and the potential role of ABO naturally occurring iso-agglutinins. Many donor, product, and patient factors can impact the response to CCP, such as antibody titer in the CCP product, CCP dose, frequency of administration, the severity of underlying illness, and the timing of administration from time of disease onset. Based on current evidence, CCP appears to be safe. However, it remains unknown whether it impacts the improvement of clinical symptoms, time to death, and all-cause mortality. In conclusion, the use of CCP offers quick access as an empirical therapy when specific therapies are not available or under development. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to add to the breadth of knowledge on the safety and efficacy of CCP use in patients with COVID-19.Copyright © 2021 AME Publishing Company.

7.
Journal of Liver Transplantation ; 7 (no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2297031
8.
Annals of Blood ; 7 (no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2296257

ABSTRACT

With increasing evidence of the success of hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation in the cure of many benign and malignant diseases, such interventions have been performed at increasing rates for the past several years. Due to myelosuppression caused by the conditioning and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimens, blood component transfusions are almost inevitably needed. During transplantation, patient's hematopoietic lineages reconstitute to the HPC donor's progenitor cell types. Therefore, specific immunoserologic and hemotherapeutic aspects need to be considered for the selection of blood components during different phases of transplantation for successful outcomes. Those considerations include but are not limited to ABO and human leucocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility of the transfused blood components with either or both the patient and the HPC donor according to the particular phase of transplantation, and the special blood component processing to reduce the risk of transfusion associated graft-versus-host disease (TA-GVHD), cytomegalovirus (CMV) transmission in CMV seronegative patients and immune mediated platelets refractoriness. Complications may still arise, particularly in major, minor, or bidirectional ABO mismatched transplantations and/or due to the HLA mismatch and alloimmunization. Here we discuss the indications, immunoserologic considerations and the special component processing of red blood cells (RBCs), platelets, granulocytes, and plasma transfusions, based upon the current evidence and describe the prevention and management of salient, pertinent complications.Copyright © 2022 The authors.

9.
Microbes and Infectious Diseases ; 2(2):224-231, 2021.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2280810

ABSTRACT

Background: Blood groups' antigens, represent polymorphic traits inherited among populations, their expression differences, can increase or decrease the host susceptibility to infections. We aimed here to correlate the relation between the different blood groups and hosts' susceptibility towards COVID-19 infection. Methods: 355 samples, were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 and blood groups typing. The candidates were then divided according to their results into;210 positive-PCR (viral persistent, clearance and ICU admitted), and 145 negative-PCR contacts and then results were compared. Results: The highest frequency in control and viral clearance group was O-phenotype, followed by A-phenotype and the least was AB-phenotype. The highest frequency in the viral persistent group, was A-group, showed followed by B-group and the least was O-group. Lastly in ICU group, A-group was the highest frequency, followed by O-group and the least was B-group. Using Chi-square method, a statistically significant result was observed (p-value= 0.034). Conclusions: The blood group-O was the protective phenotype, controversy to the O-group, A-group was the risky phenotype, also AB-group was risky, as it showed the lowest frequency in both control and viral clearance group. Interestingly, the B-group was the least group susceptible to have bad prognosis and be admitted to the ICU. This can be a safety guideline for classifying healthcare workers, according to their ABO, to work with suspected cases with COVID-19 and also may help in developing specific anti-histo-blood group antibodies as an effective co-therapy for COVID-19. © 2020 The author (s).

10.
JMS - Journal of Medical Society ; 36(3):129-133, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2248672

ABSTRACT

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 associated with bacterial infection represents a serious public health challenge. Recently, there is a remarkable increase in the number of researches that confirms the effect of Helicobacter pylori on pulmonary diseases. Aim(s): The goal of this research was to see how H. pylori affected the presentation of COVID-19 infections as a prospective risk factor. Material(s) and Method(s): This research was conducted in Babylon, Iraq, from January 1, 2022, to March 5, 2022. A total of 180 people were engaged in this study, with 90 patients identified with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction testing and 90 people serving as a control group. Antibody screening assays on blood samples were used to look for antibodies against H. pylori. The samples were processed for complete blood count and ABO blood group. Result(s): COVID-19 infection was more frequent in females than in males, especially between 31 and 45 years. When compared to healthy people, COVID-19 patients had a higher white blood cell count (P = 0.0001) and a lower lymphocyte count (P = 0.0001). H. pylori and COVID-19 have been found to have a strong relationship, especially in females. When comparing patients to healthy people, blood group A is the most common. Conclusion(s): People with H. pylori infections are considerably more sensitive to COVID-19 than people without H. pylori infections (P = 0.011). In combination with SARS-CoV-2, IgG for H. pylori might be a risk factor.Copyright © 2023 Journal of Medical Society Published by Wolters Kluwer-Medknow.

11.
Clin Transplant ; 37(5): e14952, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2274275

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we evaluated whether SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines induce anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and anti- ABO blood type antibodies (ABOAb) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). METHODS: Sixty-three adult KTRs with functioning grafts who received two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine were enrolled in this cohort. Changes in anti-ABO blood type immunoglobulin IgM and IgG antibody titers, flow panel reactive antibody (PRA), de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA), and kidney allograft function before and after vaccination were evaluated. RESULTS: Only one patient experienced conversion from negative to positive flow PRA after vaccination. However, there was no DSA in single antigen flow-bead assays. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in the eight DSA-positive recipients did not significantly change before and after vaccination (p = .383), and no additional DSA was produced after vaccination in those patients. No significant elevation of ABOAb titer was observed for either IgM (p = .438) or IgG (p = .526) after vaccination. There was no significant deterioration in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after vaccination (p = .877) or elevation of the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (p = .209) after vaccination. One episode of AMR was observed in addition to a preexisting acute cellular rejection. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine did not induce anti-HLA antibody or ABOAb production in KTRs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Kidney Transplantation , Adult , Humans , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , HLA Antigens/immunology , Immunoglobulin M , RNA, Messenger/genetics , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplant Recipients , Vaccination/adverse effects
12.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 17(1): 18-22, 2023 01 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2273390

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: SARS-COV-2, the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, has become a life-threatening public health crisis. This kind of pandemic is frightening the world with clinical, psychological, and emotional distress and leading to an economic slowdown. To explore any association between the ABO blood type and the susceptibility to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we compared ABO blood group distribution among 671 COVID-19 patients with the local control population. METHODOLOGY: The study was conducted in Blood Bank Hospital in Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. The ABO-typed blood samples were obtained from 671 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 between February and June 2021. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that the risk of SARS-COV-2 was higher for patients with blood group A than those with not-A blood type patients. Of the 671 patients with COVID-19, 301 had type A (44.86%), 232 had type B (34.58%), 53 had type AB blood (7.9%), and 85 had type O (12.67%). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the Rh-negative blood type has a protective effect on SARS-COV-2. Our results also indicate that the decreased susceptibility of individuals with blood group O and the increased susceptibility of individuals with blood group A to COVID-19 could be linked to the presence of natural anti-blood group antibodies, particularly anti-A antibody, in the blood. However, there might be other mechanisms that require further study.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , ABO Blood-Group System , Pandemics , Iraq/epidemiology
13.
Technol Health Care ; 31(4): 1375-1383, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270024

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The ABO blood group is closely related to clinical blood transfusion, transplantation, and neonatal hemolytic disease. It is also the most clinically significant blood group system in clinical blood transfusion. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to review and analyze the clinical application of the ABO blood group. METHODS: The most common ABO blood group typing methods in clinical laboratories are hemagglutination test and microcolumn gel test, while genotype detection is mainly adopted in clinical identification of suspicious blood types. However, in some cases, the expression variation or absence of blood type antigens or antibodies, experimental techniques, physiology, disease, and other factors affect the accurate determination of blood types, which may lead to serious transfusion reactions. RESULTS: The mistakes could be reduced or even eliminated by strengthening training, selecting reasonable identification methods, and optimizing processes, thereby improving the overall identification level of the ABO blood group. ABO blood groups are also correlated with many diseases, such as COVID-19 and malignant tumors. Rh blood groups are determined by the RHD and RHCE homologous genes on chromosome 1 and are classified as Rh negative or positive according to the D antigen., the agglutination method is often used in clinical settings, while genetic and sequencing methods are often used in scientific research. CONCLUSION: Accurate ABO blood typing is a critical requirement for the safety and effectiveness of blood transfusion in clinical practice. Most studies were designed for investigating rare Rh blood group family, and there is a lack of research on the relationship between Rh blood groups and common diseases.

14.
Elife ; 122023 03 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2253169

ABSTRACT

Background: Whether natural selection may have attributed to the observed blood group frequency differences between populations remains debatable. The ABO system has been associated with several diseases and recently also with susceptibility to COVID-19 infection. Associative studies of the RhD system and diseases are sparser. A large disease-wide risk analysis may further elucidate the relationship between the ABO/RhD blood groups and disease incidence. Methods: We performed a systematic log-linear quasi-Poisson regression analysis of the ABO/RhD blood groups across 1,312 phecode diagnoses. Unlike prior studies, we determined the incidence rate ratio for each individual ABO blood group relative to all other ABO blood groups as opposed to using blood group O as the reference. Moreover, we used up to 41 years of nationwide Danish follow-up data, and a disease categorization scheme specifically developed for diagnosis-wide analysis. Further, we determined associations between the ABO/RhD blood groups and the age at the first diagnosis. Estimates were adjusted for multiple testing. Results: The retrospective cohort included 482,914 Danish patients (60.4% females). The incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of 101 phecodes were found statistically significant between the ABO blood groups, while the IRRs of 28 phecodes were found statistically significant for the RhD blood group. The associations included cancers and musculoskeletal-, genitourinary-, endocrinal-, infectious-, cardiovascular-, and gastrointestinal diseases. Conclusions: We found associations of disease-wide susceptibility differences between the blood groups of the ABO and RhD systems, including cancer of the tongue, monocytic leukemia, cervical cancer, osteoarthrosis, asthma, and HIV- and hepatitis B infection. We found marginal evidence of associations between the blood groups and the age at first diagnosis. Funding: Novo Nordisk Foundation and the Innovation Fund Denmark.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Female , Male , Humans , ABO Blood-Group System/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/genetics , Risk Assessment , Disease Susceptibility
15.
Clin Transplant ; 37(2): e14915, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2274777

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation have improved with the introduction of desensitization therapy with rituximab. However, rituximab prevents not only antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) but also increases the risk of adverse events, such as infection. For ABOi kidney transplantation in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers, we previously used a rituximab-free desensitization protocol and then initiated a single dose of 100 mg rituximab in 2016. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of ABOi kidney transplantation in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers before and after the introduction of rituximab. METHODS: ABOi kidney transplantations (n = 142) in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers between 2007 and 2021 were included. Patients were divided into two groups (with and without rituximab) for desensitization. The primary outcomes were the incidence of acute AMR and infection. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were desensitized without rituximab (rituximab-free group), and 76 were pretreated with 100 mg rituximab (rituximab group) before transplantation. The incidence of acute AMR was significantly lower in the rituximab group than in the rituximab-free group (.0% [0/76] vs. 7.6% [5/66], respectively; p = .047). Post-transplantation anti-A/B antibody titers were also lower in the rituximab group than in the rituximab-free group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events, including infections, between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In ABOi kidney transplantation patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers, the desensitization protocol with a single dose of 100 mg rituximab was effective in preventing acute AMR without increasing the risk of other adverse events.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Antibodies , Blood Group Incompatibility , ABO Blood-Group System , Graft Rejection/drug therapy , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Survival , Living Donors
16.
SAGE Open Med ; 10: 20503121221095413, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2261699

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Recent studies after the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 have shown an association of the ABO blood group to the susceptibility of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Anti-A and anti-B antibodies, carbohydrate clustering, interleukin-6 levels and host transmembrane protease serine subtype 2 were suggested to cause the variable susceptibility of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection to the ABO blood groups. This study aims to find the association of the ABO blood group with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection susceptibility in Nepal. Methods: Population-based matched case-control study was conducted from October 2021 to February 2022 in Rupandehi district of Nepal. A total of 1091 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 cases and 2182 controls were included in the study by convenient sampling method. Results: A statistically significant association of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection was observed for the blood group AB between cases and controls (11.5% vs 8.5%; odds ratio = 1.4, 95% confidence interval = 1.10-1.78). However, there was no association of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection for blood group A (26.7% vs 28.23%; odds ratio = 0.93, 95% confidence interval = 0.79-1.09), B (26.9% vs 29.84%; odds ratio = 0.86, 95% confidence interval = 0.73-1.02) and O (34.9% vs 33.41%; odds ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval = 0.92-1.25). Conclusion: This study reported slightly more susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection among individuals with blood group AB.

17.
Ocul Surf ; 2022 Nov 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2243353

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report outcomes of keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) compatible for both human leukocyte (HLA) and/or blood type using oral prednisone, mycophenolate, and tacrolimus, with basiliximab if panel reactive antibodies (PRA) are present. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was used post-operatively if donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) were present. METHODS: Retrospective interventional series of consecutive patients with KLAL for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) from HLA and/or blood type compatible deceased donors with a minimum follow-up time of 12 months. Main outcome measures were ocular surface stability, visual acuity and systemic immunosuppression (SI) adverse events. RESULTS: Eight eyes of eight patients with mean age of 48.6 ±â€¯10.1 years (range 34-65 years) were included. Mean follow-up time was 37.3 ±â€¯22.7 months (range 12-71 months) following KLAL; four (50%) had combined LR-CLAL surgery. The etiologies of LSCD were Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (n = 4/8), aniridia (n = 2/8), chemical injury (n = 1/8) and atopic eye disease (n = 1/8). All patients had PRA present and received basiliximab infusions. 5/8 patients received IVIG based on DSA identified pre-operatively. At last follow-up, 7 eyes (87.5%) had a stable ocular surface; 1 eye (12.5%) developed failure and had keratoprosthesis implantation. There was a significant improvement in visual acuity from 1.65 ±â€¯0.48 to 0.68 ±â€¯0.34 logMAR (p = 0.01). SI was tolerated well with minimal adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary outcomes of KLAL with ABO compatible tissue using the Cincinnati protocol, preoperative basiliximab (when PRA present) and post-operative IVIG (when DSA present) are encouraging. This protocol may allow for utilization of deceased donor tissue with results approximating those of living donor tissue transplanted for severe bilateral LSCD.

18.
Transfus Clin Biol ; 2022 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2239608

ABSTRACT

We have shown in an ethnically homogenous Turkey cohort with more than six thousand cases and 25 thousand controls that ABO blood types that contain anti-A antibody (O and B) are protective against COVID-19 infection and hospitalization, whereas those without the anti-A antibody (A and AB) are risks. The A + AB frequency increases from 54.7 % in uninfected controls to 57.6 % in COVID-19 outpatients, and to 62.5 % in COVID-19 inpatients. The odds-ratio (OR) for lacking of anti-A antibody risk for infection is 1.16 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.22, and Fisher test p-value 1.8 × 10-7). The OR for hospitalization is 1.23 (95 %CI 1.06-1.42, Fisher test p-value 0.005). A linear regression treating controls, outpatients, inpatients as three numerical levels over anti-A antibody leads to a p-value of 5.9 × 10-9. All these associations remain to be statistically significant after conditioning over age, even though age itself is a risk for both infection and hospitalization. We also attempted to correct the potential effect from vaccination, even though vaccination information is not available, by using the date of the data collection as a surrogate to vaccination status. Although no significant association between infection/hospitalization with Rhesus blood system was found, forest plots are used to illustrate possible trends.

19.
Transplantation ; 106(9):S246-S246, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2229288
20.
Medical Immunology (Russia) ; 24(6):1265-1270, 2022.
Article in Russian | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2232061

ABSTRACT

We present a case of long-term organ functioning (ca.10 years) after allografting of a cadaveric kidney without usage of immunosuppressing drugs. In 2005, a patient suffering from a hypertensive form of chronic glomerulonephritis, have received an allogeneic graft of cadaveric kidney compatible for AB0 system, HLA antigens (A19, B07, DR04), and negative results of cross-match test. The graft function was immediately restored, with normalization of creatinine levels achieved 4-5 days after surgery. Immunosuppression with cyclosporine, solumedrol, cellcept, metypred and simulect was performed in the hospital. Pulse therapy with solumedrol was performed on the day +20 due to the development of initial rejection signs. The postoperative period proceeded without infectious complications. The patient was discharged being recommended to take cyclosporine, Cell-Sept and Metypred. Within a year after transplantation, the patient claimed for pain in the hip joint, and, therefore, metypred was completely canceled. Subsequently, the Cellcept was replaced with a Mayfortic. In 2007, the signs of coxarthrosis were revealed at computed tomography, followed by aseptic necrosis of the the right femur head. Deforming osteoarthritis of the right hip joint was detected, and the hip replacement surgery was suggested. In 2010, due to risk of side effects from ongoing immunosuppressive therapy, e.g., joint damage, the Mayfortic was canceled. In 2012, being in fear of original Sandimmun Neoral replacement by a generic drug, the patient completely refused cyclosporine therapy. In 2021, the endoprosthetics of the right hip joint was performed, and the surgical wound healed initially. Since 2012, the patient has not completely taken immunosuppressive therapy. Over this time period, the patient has never been admitted to the hospital for impaired functioning of the organ graft. Meanwhile, he monitored his graft function on regular basis undergoing biochemical analyses, clinical examination, ultrasound studies of the graft and made regular visits to the outpatient department. In 2021, a week after hip replacement, there was a slight increase in serum creatinine, followed by further increase to 230 mmol/L in 2021, and to 310 mmol/L in March 2022. In February 2022, the patient suffered mild respiratory infection (confirmed COVID-19). In March 2022, the first clinical signs of increasing nephropathy appeared, i.e., swelling of both lower extremities, with leukocytes in urine upon routine analysis, increased blood flow resistance in the main artery of the transplant shown by ultrasound study. Due to worsening of the patient's condition, he resumed taking the prescribed immunosuppressants. Copyright © 2022, SPb RAACI.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL